WTI drops to lowest since June ahead of US–Russia summit
Crude oil prices extended their slide on Friday, with the WTI prompt-month contract settling $1.16 lower at $62.80/Bbl, the lowest close since June 2. The decline came ahead of a pivotal US–Russia summit in Anchorage, Alaska, where Presidents Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin are expected to discuss a potential ceasefire in Ukraine. An agreement could pave the way for easing US sanctions on Russian crude exports, adding barrels to an already oversupplied market.
OPEC+ is set to implement its final tranche of production hikes on September 1, adding another 548 MBbl/d as part of the group’s accelerated return of 2.2 MMBbl/d of curtailed output. At the same time, the demand outlook has weakened. China, the world’s largest crude importer, reported softer-than-expected July industrial production, retail sales, and fixed-asset investment. The slowdown adds to concerns that the global economy is losing momentum, further eroding demand growth expectations.
Against this backdrop, the EIA’s latest Short-Term Energy Outlook (STEO) reinforced the bearish tilt in market sentiment. The agency cut its WTI price forecast for 2025 by $1.64 to $63.58/Bbl and for 2026 by $7.05 to $47.77/Bbl, citing expectations for sizable OECD inventory builds. Commercial stocks are now projected to rise by more than 2 MMBbl/d in 4Q25 and 1 MMBbl/d in 1Q26, roughly 0.8 MMBbl/d higher than last month’s forecast. While the EIA expects weaker prices in early 2026 to prompt output cuts, those reductions are not anticipated until later in the year, slowing stock builds only in the second half of 2026.
In the near term, prices remain under pressure from the combination of rising supply, swelling inventories, and softening macroeconomic indicators. While production pullbacks in late 2026 could slow stock builds, the prevailing outlook points to a market dominated by excess supply and constrained demand, with geopolitical developments serving as the primary driver of short-term volatility. AEGIS maintains a neutral view with a bias to the downside.